I’m continually amazed at the vulgarity and general acceptance in North American enclaves of the many horse-faced, forty or fifty-something-year-old North American men seen, who move to countries like Nicaragua seeking teen aged, financially dependent brides for a "daddy/daughter" fantasy relationship. The type of men who convince themselves that these teen brides actually want them as a husband instead of a financier. Can you imagine the disgust they would face in the U.S. or Canada if they exercised these types of practices with our daughters? Many of these old goats would be shunned if they did this in North America, so why is it accepted in Latin American countries?
They spend a great amount of time commenting about the child brides as if they’ve really scored in life by exploiting someone's daughter. And the gall of these perverts to brag about “supporting the teen aged girl’s family” instead of helping the family start a business and support themselves, never ceases to amaze me. Why not keep these brides and their families dependent – these women they supposedly love – instead of actually proving they care by ensuring these women never want for anything? Especially, when they can leave and go back to the U.S. or Canada when the whim suits them, leaving behind lives in a developing country, and rejecting responsibility for supporting their own offspring. And if you think when these old geezers kick off, that these young mothers inherit bank accounts, then think again. I've known many of these girls who matured to women who were left supporting their offspring, once they mature and the old man's attraction wanes.
Sometimes I wish the CA-4 nations would stop these geezers at the border and send them back to the brothels and teen pornography houses they frequent in the U.S. But at least, if Central America is going to enable these relationships exploiting younger women who lack economic equality, then why not demand that any man twice her legal age and marrying a barely legal bride invest a bond - enough money deposited in an account to support the woman and her children when they flee the country or kick-the-bucket. Would these perverts still seek these daddy/daughter fantasies if they had to pay for their perversions?
Enablers claim these women promote this relationship because they seek out lecherous old fools like this, knowing they can improve their family’s economic future. But do they? Time and time again, I’ve seen these young girls left pregnant, while these social retards leave young brides for months on end, moving from one sex tourism hub to another. Few of them even pay off the families for exploiting their daughters. They stay around 5 to 10 years and then flee…all social responsibility vacated. Do these girls really know what the future is? Are they counseled to secure documents that give them equal access to these fools bank accounts? The answer in most cases is no! Why? Because most of these teen brides don't have access to legal help that women do in these men's countries of origin, to protect their interests. And that is exactly why they are targeted by these perverts.
If a man in his fifties wants to marry a child bride for his daddy/daughter fantasy he shouldn’t mind a requirement to ante up the funds, so that when their whim ends and they find another younger girl in their sick perverted needs, at least the previous family is well taken care of. That would secure the future of these girls and the local economies, since they don’t have the social and economic situations to educate them enough to tell these old geezers to take a hike. And it would equal the playing field, since these men can’t get turned on by a woman old enough to expect a man to pay for play.
I hope that Nicaragua and Costa Rica begin to consider the drain on local economies when these men abandon these brides and seek to remedy this some day. It would be nice if these men had better morals, but until then, maybe a bond would help solve the financial woes they leave behind.
Bookmarks